09/06/2024 / By Lance D Johnson
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) just released new rules for pediatricians and parents who want to keep babies “up to date” on their vaccinations. As of August 30, 2024, the CDC suggests that babies as young as six months old receive either two doses of the 2024-2025 Moderna vaccine or three doses of the 2024-2025 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. These vaccines aren’t even licensed yet, and their design is based off the same dangerous and ineffective COVID vaccines that have since been taken off the market.
The latest Moderna vaccine is now intended for administration in six-month-old babies, with a booster given one month after the first. The Pfizer vaccine is also intended for administration at six months old, with the second dose coming three weeks later, and a third dose no later than eight weeks after the second. These vaccines will be routinely given to babies under 15 months, along with an additional thirty-seven shots, all of which have not been subject to double blind, placebo-controlled studies, nor been safety-tested for cumulative exposure and compounding toxicity.
It is important to note that as of now, there are no licensed COVID-19 vaccines available for children under 12. The CDC is recommending babies be subject to vaccines that are currently in development and have a track record of causing health problems, instead of preventing them.
The vaccines currently recommended for babies are only authorized under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This status means that these vaccines have not undergone the full licensing process and are subject to a lower standard of evidence compared to licensed products, which have an abysmally low standard of evidence to begin with.
With these recommendations, the CDC appears to be acting in a diabolical manner yet again. The newer versions of the COVID-19 vaccines have not demonstrated safety and efficacy beyond what earlier versions showed. The entire vaccine experiment on humanity is spiraling out of control, yet the beleaguered federal agencies refuse to halt this predatory machine that sacrifices human health for pharmaceutical profits.
Albert Benavides, an analyst of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has raised alarms about the reporting and transparency of vaccine-related adverse events. VAERS has recorded over 37,000 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination, though many of these reports have vague details about age and the precise nature of the adverse events. Benavides suggests that these figures are being under-reported.
Despite the evidence of mass harm, the CDC continues to assert that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.” Still promoting dangerous and potentially life-threatening propaganda, the agency emphasizes that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of COVID-19, particularly in preventing severe disease and complications.
Subversively, the communication strategy for promoting EUA vaccines differs from licensed vaccines. For EUA products, fact sheets provided by the vaccine manufacturers detail the risks and benefits, but these are not required to be shared with patients in the same way that Vaccine Information Statements (VIS) are required for licensed vaccines. For EUA COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC directs people to “fact sheets” that are produced by the vaccine manufacturer, with no third-party holding the manufacturer accountable and no objective analysis of the risks and the lack of benefits.
Pfizer’s own fact sheet for its COVID-19 vaccine acknowledges that EUA products have not undergone the same rigorous review as FDA-approved products. After experimenting with these products on the population, and being forced by the courts to turn over initial risk data, Pfizer and the FDA has begrudgingly admitted on those fact sheets that side effects such as myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported. This is a serious risk. In Japan’s pharmacovigilance system, fatality rates for myocarditis and pericarditis can be as high as 9.6%.
Whether its an EUA product or fully-licensed product, the CDC always propagates the messaging put forth by the vaccine manufacturer. For instance, the first statement on the CDC’s “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children” says, “COVID-19 vaccination for children is safe.” This blatant lie should call into question every vaccine on the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule. Why haven’t these childhood vaccines – a list of injections that continues to grow out of control – been subject to double-blind, placebo-controlled studies?
In a way, the COVID-19 vaccine fraud has broken open a dam of lies, causing more parents around the country to question a system that is deceiving and harming the public, and as many are finding out, has pushed lies and false guilt on parents for years.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
accountability, adverse events, big government, CDC, Child abuse, child health, childhood vaccine schedule, death cult, EUA vaccines, fact sheets, FDA, infant's health, lies, myocarditis, pediatric care, propaganda, Risks, science deception, science fraud, vaccine information statements, vaccine science
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 IMMUNIZATION NEWS